Google Bard vs ChatGPT: Which one is Better?

With an anticipated 38.1% compound annual growth rate, the artificial intelligence market is experiencing unheard-of growth worldwide. The generative artificial intelligence market is projected to reach an astounding $1,811.8 billion by 2030 due to groundbreaking technological advancements like ChatGPT and Google Bard.

The ways we interact with written language have entirely changed, thanks mainly to ChatGPT and Google Bard. Bard, a product of Google, is known for its fantastic storytelling abilities designed to captivate viewers. Conversely, ChatGPT, an OpenAI creation, is precisely engineered to provide conversational responses that mimic human-to-human interactions. Both technologies have sparked a lot of interest in the ChatGPT vs Google Bard group discussion and have found use in numerous sectors.

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT, a derivative of GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), employs a sophisticated machine-learning model. Functioning as a language processor, ChatGPT autonomously generates responses. Generative Pre-trained Transformer, an artificial intelligence (AI) model capable of producing human-like text, finds applications in diverse areas, including language translation, summarization, and content generation.

Pros of ChatGPT

Based on the advanced ChatGPT model

The autoregressive language and language prediction model GPT-3 was developed by OpenAI. OpenAI was the developer of it. It is one of the most significant non-sparse language models and has been hailed as one of the most important artificial intelligence systems ever created. A monthly subscription charge is required to access ChatGPT Plus, which is likewise built on GPT-4, a more sophisticated and expansive version of GPT-3. Because of the high caliber of the writing it generates, it is challenging to tell whether or not a human wrote them.

Best for learning

One of the best ways to educate others is through GPT chat. You can hone your skills with the help of the Chat GPT. For example, Chat GPT can provide you with a wealth of information about writing fiction if you are or want to be a fiction writer. 

This can be achieved by giving it a story or paragraph you have composed in your own words and then asking it to rewrite it like any of your favorite writers. Chat GPT will finish the job in a few seconds. Analyze its response and see how it differs from the text you sent. You will learn many new insights, including terminology, vocabulary, and story-writing strategies, and understand the nuances in the Chat GPT vs Google Bard comparison.

Increased content quality

Content creators can also utilize Chat GPT to improve the caliber of their work. Many writers need to improve in particular areas, but they can use this tool to enhance the impact and profitability of their writing. This tool could improve the content’s general language quality and highlight context and grammar errors using its features.

Cons of ChatGPT

Inconsistencies and Ambiguities

The fact that ChatGPT occasionally generates phrases that seem accurate or compelling on the surface but are untrue or illogical is one of its fundamental flaws and points of criticism. This phenomenon is known as “hallucination” and is common in language models. It also provides no references or citations for further information. This chatbot should not be used only for electronic trailing and research purposes.

Does Not Fulfill the Search’s Objective

GPT material typically does not satisfy search intent. This tool is meant to answer users’ questions or provide the required information, not to try to match their search intent. It needs to know your target audience’s demographics, interests, and specifics. It reads your queries and obeys your commands, that’s all. As a result, no matter how skillfully you utilize this tool to develop content, you cannot meet customer expectations with GPT material.

What is Google Bard?

Bard was developed using the Large Language Model (LLM), commonly called LaMDA, or Language Model for Dialogue Applications. The concept for Bard originated with Google. In a similar vein, ChatGPT operates using generative pre-trained transformers. A conversational bot driven by artificial intelligence is called Google Bard. This technology allows users to issue instructions and obtain information and images similar to human language, making it relevant in the discussion of Bard vs ChatGPT for coding and programming tasks. 

Pros of Google Bard

Human-like and conversational responses 

Google Bard can interpret text-based prompts because it uses natural language processing. Additionally, it responds to the questions in a human-like manner—that is, in a conversational manner. This is just one more fantastic benefit of Google Bard. The Google Bard is a chatbot that can reply to queries, provide directions, and address inquiries about the internet. 

Particular Possibilities for Creative Action

The main feature differentiating Google Bard is its ability to produce words. It can produce material in various formats and genres, such as news articles, blog posts, essays, emails, letters, and creative writing. Bard can also generate programs in multiple programming languages and debug them. It is available for users to utilize. 

Real-time information is provided along with internet access.

Google Bard has the unique advantage of delivering the most recent and accurate results since it can gather data from the internet via Google search. Its capacity to offer internet access via real-time connectivity is incredibly beneficial for those conducting research or, more broadly, for anyone gathering information for whatever reason.

Plugins Make Extensions Possible

Another significant benefit of using Google Bard is its capacity to accommodate expansions that may be carried out through plugins. Users can use this feature in other apps or websites like Spotify, YouTube, Adobe, and travel websites to manage streaming, view videos within the same chat interface, recommend bookings, or take pictures by following prompts.  

Google Bard also has the benefit of an easy-to-use interface that makes it simple to understand and use. Another advantage of utilizing Google Bard is this. Apart from its potential for integration with Google’s offerings, this is something that customers of Google may utilize on an intuitive level.

Cons of Google Bard

Restricted creativity

Another major disadvantage is that Google Bard limits users’ capacity to communicate their views. Bard frequently makes monotonous and unoriginal remarks due to this seeming lack of originality. Furthermore, it may tend to write poetry, song lyrics, and other works similar to those already created. 

It never provides a source

Although Bard is accommodating for research purposes since it allows for correct data, it can negatively impact research if it is entirely relied upon as a tool for study. One of the website’s shortcomings is that it needs to cite or offer links to its material sources. The fact that Google Bard isn’t a stand-alone tool for research is among its most significant shortcomings. One of the most significant drawbacks is this. 

Google Bard vs ChatGPT Detailed Comparison

Training Model

The most important differentiator between Bard’s and ChatGPT’s techniques is the usage of large language models (LLM). While the Google Bard platform is built on the PaLM 2 design, the OpenAI-developed ChatGPT platform is built on the Transformer architecture.

Although both have made serious errors, AI constantly improves and learns new things.

The training material for the GPT-3 and GPT-4’s predecessors was a wide range of texts downloaded from the internet. We refer to books, articles, documents, web pages, and other materials here. On the other hand, the addition of Infiniset, a dataset mainly focusing on conversations and dialogues, enhanced the training of Google PALM2.

Common Crawl, Wikipedia, published documents, and a diverse range of online chats comprise the content that Infiniset has been ingesting. Furthermore, Google Bard uses an artificial intelligence model built to search the internet in real-time, providing users with relevant and current answers to their questions.

ChatGPT employs a similar strategy and uses training data from Common Crawl, Wikipedia, books, journals, and documents through 2021. This indicates that ChatGPT’s artificial intelligence engine still needs to keep up with the most recent developments in science and society.

Content Accuracy

One of the most significant distinctions between ChatGPT and Google Bard is that the latter has internet connectivity. Google Bard can access the most recent information and ensure that its responses are always based on the latest data because it has a real-time internet connection. However, real-time internet accessibility is not available for ChatGPT. In the ChatGPT vs Google Bard comparison, ChatGPT’s training data needs to be updated, meaning that its answers are predicated on that data.

Coding

ChatGPT generated cleaner code and was more adept at deciphering vague instructions than Google Bard. Furthermore, it provided a more comprehensive description of the created code than Google Bard did.

However, Google Bard excelled in one particular area: code reorganization. It gave code that generated benchmarks and the outcomes of those benchmarks in addition to optimized code solutions. This capability highlights Google Bard’s potential in writing performant and efficient code. The benefit that Google Bard has in this specific domain stems from the fact that, in addition to being a Large Language Model (LLM), it leverages search engine data; ChatGPT, on the other hand, is limited to being an LLM at the moment of testing.

Retention Ability

One of the most significant distinctions between Google Bard and ChatGPT is the latter’s inability to retain the context of prior exchanges. Though ChatGPT can store up to 3,000 words of conversation history, it only consciously employs this information for response generation. This means that ChatGPT can find it challenging to maintain the flow of a discussion and provide pertinent answers to follow-up questions.

However, Google Bard excels when retaining and utilizing context from prior discussions. As a result, it may adjust its responses more skillfully, capitalizing on the experience it has accumulated from earlier interactions. Consequently, this makes Google Bard more capable of providing precise answers and maintaining the conversation thread across multiple interactions.

Language Support

Extending language coverage benefits artificial intelligence language models such as ChatGPT and Bard. These models promote inclusivity and accessibility since they can handle multiple languages, enabling them to accommodate a larger global audience.

Bard now supports forty languages, including Korean and Japanese. This demonstrates Google’s commitment to making sure that every language is covered. Due to its increased support for more languages, Bard can provide a broader range of users with language-specific insights, information, and help from people all across the globe.

ChatGPT supports over fifty languages, making it easy for users to communicate with one another and get help in their preferred language. This facilitates comfortable interaction between users of different language backgrounds and the system, enhancing comprehension and effective communication.

ChatGPT is the clear winner in this arena because it supports many languages.

Creativity 

Because there is no exact standard by which the originality of these technologies can be directly compared to one another, it is challenging to assess their creative output. We assigned each of them the same creative task since we wanted to conduct an objective evaluation. Based on their responses, we then subjectively assessed each of them.

Security

Privacy and security are significant concerns for both ChatGPT and Google Bard. Critics point out that ChatGPT has been used to create ransomware and phishing emails, increasing the risk of cybersecurity breaches. It records conversations and collects personal data for training, allowing human trainers to examine the chat transcripts. Since specific prompts cannot be removed from ChatGPT’s history, users are strongly advised not to divulge private or sensitive information.

Client Support

Regarding customer service automation, the ChatGPT platform outperforms the Bard platform. Regarding answering customer questions, ChatGPT excels at using a framework based on commonly requested queries. It can answer questions about delivery schedules, status, returns of products, availability and options of products and services, and technical support.

On the other hand, Bard is better at scheduling appointments, controlling time, and ensuring that a procedure is carried out exactly how it should be. It can also be used to automate tasks like booking reservations at restaurants and scheduling trips. Therefore, if automating the customer support process is the goal, ChatGPT is the better option.

Conclusion

This analysis of ChatGPT vs Bard highlights the utility of each product in simplifying tasks. However, it’s important to note that, currently, neither can function as a standalone customer-facing tool, presenting certain limitations. For more insights, Get in touch with us at Tagline Infotech. Let’s assess their respective strengths and weaknesses to determine which excels in various aspects!

FAQ’S